The doctor sends the details of prescription to HIRA DUR service before issuing the prescription to the patient.
HIRA sends a warning message in a pop-up window on the doctors computer screen within 0.5 seconds, in case
there is a risk factor in the prescription when compared to the patients medication history, suspended drug list, and
DUR standards. The doctor could choose to change the prescription or to proceed with the original prescription with
a memo, explaining why the drug should be used exceptionally. The final prescription information is sent to and stored in the DUR system of HIRA
Pharmacists undergo the same process at the pharmacy when dispensing. For a warning message, the pharmacist
could choose to change, or go ahead with the original prescription after checking with the doctor. The final
dispensing detail information is sent to and stored in the DUR system of HIRA
Operational Performance
The only system in the world which checks patients’ medication history on a real-time basis
Prevention of drug misuse and abuse and reduction of pharmaceutical expenditure by preventing inappropriate use of drugs in advance (Saved over 20 billion KRW a year)
Support safe prescription and dispensing practice by the real-time response (Prevented 5.4 million cases of unsafe use of drugs in prescription)
Guaranteed fast response and 24/7 uninterrupted service
A nationwide pharmaceutical monitoring system
Support safe use of drug
Facilitate links between computer systems via a standardized code
Healthcare providers’ EMR and HIRA system are directly linked, expanding the information transmission channel
Safe blood transfusion based on the patient medication history
Based on the real-time drug monitoring, national level supervision is possible (epidemic, narcotic drugs, and etc.)
Medical claims portal service
Benefit claim submission and result notice procedure
Healthcare providers fill in benefit claim file using Claim Software accredited by HIRA. The file is inspected by benefit claim portal program before submission
If the claim file passes the checkup process, it is compressed and encrypted to be sent directly to HIRA via the Internet with digital signature
The claim file is verified by the digital signature, and transmitted to the review linkage system where the data set is decompressed, decrypted, and sent to the review system
When the review is completed, a review result notification is produced, compressed, encrypted, and sent to the data center
Healthcare providers receive and check the review result through the Benefit Claims Portal
Operational Performance
Enhance national competitiveness by reducing social cost such as paper document resubmission costs, logistics costs, and etc (Replaced 1.4 billion paper documents with electronic documents in 2013)
Support providers’ management efficiency by streamlining claims submission and reimbursement process (Claims review period : paper 40 days 구 electronic 15 days)
Protect personal information and privacy by encrypting claims data
Nationwide healthcare data supports policy-making process by collecting medical records swiftly and accurately
Medical claims review
Review procedure and types
Claims review process starts with the submission of "benefit claim statement" by providers, which contains details of provided medical services and the cost
[Electronic checkup] All statements go through electronic checkup to see the accuracy of basic information such as disease code, claim code, and the service price
[Al electronic review] By combining IT technology and review staffs knowhow, logical electronic review of seven steps is conducted with artificial intelligence
[Close Review] Claims that have high probability of error, or requires professional medical judgment are referred to
review staff for a manual review. More complex cases are once again referred to committee member review, and to the review committee where experts gather to discuss the case
[Post-management] For the cases that had unchecked items passed, HIRA operates post management of additional
review to claw the misjudged benefits back. If providers or the insurer object to HIRA's decision, they can file an appeal with supporting materials.
Operational Performance
Saving health insurance fund by preventing unnecessary expenditure
Support providers’ administration efficiency by processing the review quickly
Secure improved productivity, payroll cost reduction, and consistency in review result by utilizing Al
Information management which enables real-time monitoring of review standard, review records, claim and review tendency
Improve review quality by using knowledge utilized for review process (Review Knowledge Bank)
Quality assessment
Quality assessment procedure
In accordance with the priority, items are selected, and preliminary assessments are conducted. The Ministry of
Health and Welfare makes the final decision on the item selection, and the assessment plan is released on the HIRA website and media two months prior to the actual assessment
For the assessment, necessary data are collected, which include medical records, healthcare providers’ resources information (workforce, facility, equipment), and death data
Credibility check is done on the collected data to check the data quality. And treatment trend, risk-adjusted indicator
results, and composite score are produced from the data. The Central Assessment Committee and expert advisory
body make final decision on the target provider, assessment indicators and standards, composite score standardization, weighted value, released section, etc.
Assessment results are released through HIRA website. The public can use the information when choosing providers, and the results are also used for the Pay for Performance program
Operational Performance
Overall service quality improvement of all healthcare providers
Decrease the number of drugs per prescription (4.32 in 2002 → 3.76 in 2013), decrease the outpatient prescribed injection rate (38.6% in 2002 →19.0% in 2013)
Reasonable spending of health insurance fund by using assessment review results for Pay for Performance program
Help the public choose healthcare provider reasonably, based on the assessment results
Use the review result for the operation of healthcare system (selection of regional hub hospital, regional emergency medical center designation, comprehensive management of antibiotic resistance)
On-site Investigation procedure
During the review and assessment procedure, HIRA may request an investigation of the providers who are likely to
claim unfair charges. Also, Other institutions (Anti- Corruption & Civil Rights Commission, Public Prosecutors Office)
may request an investigation of the providers who are likely to claim unfair charges or who have made unfair claims
A reasonable investigation plan is established while considering urgency and efficiency. A recalculation process for
adjustment is implemented with regard to payments made during the period subject to the investigation, based
on the providers statement Based on the recalculation process, details of the appropriate course of administrative action are determined
HIRA also announces the list of providers with unfair or illegal claims if they meet certain criteria.
Post-management of the providers’ compliance of administrative measures such as service suspension is followed
Operational Performance
Prevention of false claims and reduction of health insurance spending (Saving of about 20 billion KRW annually, indirect medical costs savings are very high)
Create a healthy healthcare environment through investigation and monitoring for fraudulent medical activities
Improve healthcare system (police effect) by investigating social issues (Increase in specific surgery numbers, excessive drug use, and etc.)
Creating a healthy medical claims culture and preventing unnecessary healthcare spending
Medical fee verification procedure
Patients may request HIRA to verify medical fee charged by providers for non cov-ered services are covered by National Health Insurance
When patients request medical verification, HIRA may obtain related material from the provider and proceed with
analysis and review (If necessary, Healthcare Review and Assessment Committee deliberation takes place). The results will be notified to the patient and provider
The provider checks the result and refunds extra charge to the patient
Operational Performance
Checks whether co-payment of non covered services were charged while complying with statutes (3 billion KRW reimbursement to patients annually)
Protect the rights of patient by detecting false claims activities of providers
Build trust process between providers and patients (provider - patient relationship)
