Contents Go Main Menu Go Main Menu Go

Newsroom

Press Release

[News] Publication of Review Result of the 8th Pharmaceutical Reimbursement Evaluation Committee of 2025
  • Date2025-11-18

Publication of Review Result of the 8th Pharmaceutical Reimbursement Evaluation Committee of 2025

 

The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA, President: Kang Jung-Gu) announced the results of the 8th Drug Benefit Evaluation Committee deliberations held in 2025.

 

 ○ Deliberation Results on the Appropriateness of Reimbursement for the Requested Drug

 

Product

Manufacturer

Indications

Deliberation Results

Livmali Injection (Maralixibat Chloride), GC Pharma

GC Pharma

Treatment of cholestatic pruritus in patients with Alagille syndrome.

Reimbursement deemed appropriate

 

Isturisa Film-Coated Tablets 1.5 mg (Osilodrostat Phosphate)

Recordati Korea Co., Ltd.

Treatment of adult patients with Cushing’s disease who are ineligible for pituitary surgery or do not achieve sufficient effect after surgery.

Reimbursement deemed appropriate

 

○ 2025 Health Insurance Drug Reimbursement Re-evaluation Deliberation Results

Active Ingredient

Indications

Deliberation Results

Olopatadine Hydrochloride

(Oral) Allergic rhinitis, pruritus associated with skin disorders

Reimbursement deemed appropriate

(Ophthalmic) Allergic conjunctivitis

(Nasal spray) Seasonal allergic rhinitis

Clematidis radix, Trichosanthis Radix, Prunella vulgaris

Symptom relief for osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease) and rheumatoid arthritis

Reimbursement deemed appropriate

Bepotastine

(Oral) Perennial allergic rhinitis, chronic urticaria, and pruritus associated with skin disorders (eczema, dermatitis, pruritus, and scabies)

Reimbursement deemed appropriate

(Ophthalmic) Treatment of itching due to allergic conjunctivitis

Spherical Adsorptive Carbon

Improvement of uremic symptoms in progressive chronic renal failure and delay of dialysis initiation

Reimbursement is not appropriate 1)

Mugwort Extract

Improvement of gastric mucosal lesions (erosion, bleeding, redness, edema) in: acute gastritis, chronic gastritis

Reimbursement is not appropriate 1)

L-Aspartate-L-Ornithine

(Oral) Adjunct therapy for detoxification in severe liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis)

Reimbursement deemed appropriate2)

  Limited to hepatic encephalopathy

(Injection 0.1 g/mL) Adjunct therapy for severe liver disease: hepatitis, post-hepatitis sequelae, cirrhosis

 Domestic clinical trials (MFDS clinical re-evaluation) in progress

Reimbursement is not appropriate1)

(Injection 0.5 g/mL) Adjunct therapy for severe liver disease: hepatic encephalopathy (pre-coma and coma stages)

Reimbursement deemed appropriate

Selglicotide

Gastritis and duodenitis

 Domestic clinical trials (MFDS clinical re-evaluation) in progress

Reimbursement is not appropriate 3)

Chenodeoxycholic Acid–Ursodeoxycholic Acid Trihydrate Magnesium Salt

1.  Cholesterol gallstones (radiolucent gallstones), particularly in patients with normal gallbladder function; residual or recurrent stones after biliary surgery

2. Biliary dyspepsia

 Domestic clinical trial (MFDS clinical re-evaluation) in progress

Reimbursement is not appropriate1)

 

1) No clinical usefulness evidence

2) Clinical usefulness unclear, but cost-effective

3) Clinical usefulness unclear and not cost-effective

- For the eight active ingredients, pharmaceutical companies may submit an objection to HIRA within 30 days of receiving the results. Submitted objections will be reviewed again by the Drug Benefit Evaluation Committee.

 

In accordance with Article 11-2 of the “Regulations on Standards for National Health Insurance Benefits,” the President of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) evaluates the appropriateness of drug coverage through deliberation by the Drug Benefit Evaluation Committee. The detailed coverage scope of the drug may differ from its indications, and the final evaluation results may change in the event of changes to standard items, modifications, or withdrawal (cancellation) of the approved specifications of the requested drug, or other relevant circumstances.

 

In accordance with Article 13, Paragraph 4, Item 17 of the “Regulations on Standards for National Health Insurance Benefits,” the President of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) conducts re-evaluation of the appropriateness of National Health Insurance drug coverage through deliberation by the Drug Benefit Evaluation Committee. Following notification of the evaluation results related to the specific ingredient, the final evaluation results may change depending on the pharmaceutical company’s appeal assessment.

 

Prev
[News] Publication of Review Result of the 6th Serious Illness (Cancer) Review Committee of 2025
Next
[News] Results of the 1st Evaluation of Breast and Liver Cancer in the 2nd Cycle Released